NEMA Home
|
Sign in
NEMA Currents
Home
Syndication
RSS for Posts
Atom
RSS for Comments
Recent Posts
Bipartisanship Reigns: Senate Committee Approves Efficiency Bill
Bipartisan Approach to Helium Legislation
Our Take: Harmonious Sounds At Shaheen-Portman Energy Efficiency Hearing
Shaheen-Portman tackles market barriers to greater investment in industrial energy efficiency
Argonne Observations
Tags
Anti-Counterfeiting
Card Check
Congress
Economics
Economy
EFCA
Electrical Grid
Electrical Safety
electricity
Emerging Technologies
energy
Energy Efficiency
Environment
General
Lighting
manufacturing
medical imaging
Nanotechnology
Regulation
renewable energy
Safety and Standardization
Smart Grid
Standardization
Trade
transmission
View more
Blog Roll
ElectricalTrends
GE Global Impact blog
ShopFloor
BizCentral.org
MfgCrunch.com
ANSI
Compliance Today
Archives
May 2013 (1)
April 2013 (7)
March 2013 (1)
February 2013 (1)
January 2013 (1)
December 2012 (2)
October 2012 (1)
September 2012 (1)
August 2012 (1)
July 2012 (1)
June 2012 (3)
May 2012 (2)
April 2012 (1)
March 2012 (4)
February 2012 (3)
January 2012 (3)
December 2011 (6)
November 2011 (5)
October 2011 (5)
September 2011 (7)
August 2011 (9)
July 2011 (5)
June 2011 (10)
May 2011 (5)
April 2011 (3)
March 2011 (8)
February 2011 (9)
January 2011 (4)
December 2010 (6)
November 2010 (4)
October 2010 (10)
September 2010 (12)
August 2010 (20)
July 2010 (23)
June 2010 (22)
May 2010 (10)
April 2010 (16)
March 2010 (12)
February 2010 (16)
January 2010 (13)
December 2009 (14)
November 2009 (16)
October 2009 (17)
September 2009 (19)
August 2009 (21)
July 2009 (23)
June 2009 (22)
May 2009 (23)
April 2009 (30)
March 2009 (24)
February 2009 (24)
January 2009 (18)
December 2008 (20)
November 2008 (21)
October 2008 (27)
September 2008 (33)
August 2008 (28)
July 2008 (25)
June 2008 (29)
May 2008 (29)
April 2008 (33)
March 2008 (32)
February 2008 (38)
January 2008 (36)
“P-4, But Little More”
Washington
may join negotiations on investment and financial services with the “P-4” group of Singapore, New Zealand, Chile and Brunei.
We’re hardly opposed to this initiative, but a recent U.S. Chamber announcement went too far in expressing hope that these talks “will serve as a catalyst to open markets for U.S. exports and investment across the Asia-Pacific region, including Latin America.” Moreover: “this ‘P-plus’ arrangement could also lay the foundation for a free trade agreement among the 21 members of the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum.”Talk about trying to make it sound breathtaking!
We already have free trade agreements with the pro-trade government of Singapore and Chile.
Tiny Brunei, with oil deposits and large bank accounts, is hardly typical of the region.
And what’s notable about our talks with NZ is that we aren’t broaching the idea of a full free trade agreement that – unlike an accord on just investment and financial services -- would directly benefit U.S. electroindustry exports.
Yet, in addition to long-standing differences over NZ’s “nuclear-free” policy, they have well-founded gripes about our various agricultural protections & subsidies.
Indeed, how is there ever going to be an APEC FTA if we act as though we’re scared of the Kiwis!
Posted
02-04-2008 8:51 AM
by
Meakem, John
Add a Comment
Name:
(optional)
Website:
(optional)
Comments
(required)
Remember Me?
Copyright © 2013 NEMA. All rights reserved.