NEMAVue Video's on YouTube

Storm Reconstruction: Rebuild Smart - Reduce Outages, Save Lives, Protect Property

Subscribe to NEMAcast

ANSI Z535 Standards

eicareers Career Center

NEMA Currents

Oh, Snap!

With so-called "card check" legislation effectively dead with little (if any) hope for resuscitation, attention now turns to the newest battle brewing between labor unions and industry/business interests: "quickie" (or "snap") union elections.

On June 21, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) proposed reforms of the procedures it follows prior and subsequent to conducting secret ballot elections to determine if employees wish to be represented by unions for collective bargaining purposes. As expected, labor advocates have endorsed the proposed amendments while various industry and business groups - led by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, National Association of Manufacturers, and others - have countered with staunch opposition. Here are some of the proposed changes:

  • Under current rules, most (roughly 95%) union elections take place within two months after a union gathers enough signatures for workers at a particular site to file a petition. According to a 2008 NLRB study, it takes an average of 57 days for workers to vote on joining a union after presenting a petition asking for a vote. The NLRB proposal would shorten that time frame, requiring elections to be held in as little as 10 to 21 days after an organizing petition is filed. NLRB says this will "reduce unnecessary litigation"; NAM counters that the proposal limits the time employers have to provide employees with information to help them make informed choices.
  • Employers also take issue with the provisions in NLRB's proposal that would shorten the time that employers have to submit electronic lists of employees to labor unions before an election from 7 days to 2 days.
  • Currently, the NLRB itself is required to decide most post-election disputes. Under the proposed changes, NLRB would have the discretion to deny review of post-election rulings, instead permitting career Regional Directors to make final decisions.

The NLRB is accepting public comments on the proposal in two ways: through a public Board hearing scheduled for July 18-19, and through a 60-day period for written comments, with 14 days for replies.

It will be interesting to see how this all plays out - the NLRB already is taking heat from Congress on its move to block the opening of a non-union Boeing facility in South Carolina, a decision that even President Obama's Commerce Secretary nominee - John Bryson - has criticized. I think things are going to get a lot hotter in Washington this summer.

Posted 06-21-2011 7:00 AM by owens


Leibowitz, Mike wrote re: Oh, Snap!
on 06-27-2011 11:45 AM

The NLRB and its officers are not accountable to the voters, and is not acting as an impartial rules setting agency. Rather it has  become an extension of union bosses' strong armed tactics.  No matter how many times a company votes not to unionize, the outcome must to be questioned and scrutinized and a recount taken until the they get the vote "right".

Labor unions were needed at one time in our history but today with less than 10% of the private sector workforce unionized, they have outlived their usefulness. To Congress: the NLRB needs to be de-funded and shut down.

Add a Comment

Remember Me?
Copyright © 2014 NEMA. All rights reserved.