<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blog.nema.org/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Time to Relax</title><link>http://blog.nema.org/blogs/currents/archive/2009/07/02/time-to-relax.aspx</link><description>Since I am in long-weekend mode already, and don&amp;#39;t want to interrupt the reverie by pointing out that firm signs of economic recovery remain elusive, I thought I&amp;#39;d direct readers to some interesting takes on two important policy issues: cap-and</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 (Debug Build: 30929.2835)</generator><item><title>re: Time to Relax</title><link>http://blog.nema.org/blogs/currents/archive/2009/07/02/time-to-relax.aspx#11327</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:53:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">1447dd18-a85e-48e6-bb73-6fd9ba4b7540:11327</guid><dc:creator>Lynne</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Brian,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the link! I would just add that while I believe that emissions trading honors the underlying problem, which is ill-defined property rights, I do not believe that this Congress or this piece of legislation are capable of producing an institutional design to deliver on that potential.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Enjoy your long weekend!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blog.nema.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=11327" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>