<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blog.nema.org/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Electrical Safety – Ohio Back on Track.</title><link>http://blog.nema.org/blogs/currents/archive/2008/12/15/electrical-safety-ohio-back-on-track.aspx</link><description>Common sense won the day as the Ohio Board of Building Standards voted for a second time to adopt the 2008 National Electrical Code (NEC) on December 12 th . This cleared up a confused year in which Governor Stickland succumbed to pressure from the Home</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 (Debug Build: 30929.2835)</generator><item><title>re: Electrical Safety – Ohio Back on Track.</title><link>http://blog.nema.org/blogs/currents/archive/2008/12/15/electrical-safety-ohio-back-on-track.aspx#7638</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:21:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">1447dd18-a85e-48e6-bb73-6fd9ba4b7540:7638</guid><dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Electrical saftey is always good. That beeing said, with regards to arc fault breakers. Untill someone show&amp;#39;s me test results that suggest we have a problem with new home&amp;#39;s having arc fault fires, the code adoption is &amp;nbsp;frutel efort. I can see the benefit for older homes, but new homes? Not sold on that at all. The cost of a new home has gone threw the roof, so now on an average home add another $500 in the name of saftey, common sense?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blog.nema.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7638" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>